Tag: Amnesty International

  • The Human Rights Violations Seen From Space

    The Human Rights Violations Seen From Space

    The City’s Cameron Weymes compares historical Google Earth imagery to illustrate human rights violations committed by various governments in the Middle East.

    Human rights have been defined as “norms that aspire to protect all people everywhere from severe political, legal, and social abuses.”

    Each event shown below has been documented by rights organizations to be contrary to these principles.

    Slide the bar left and right to reveal differences

    The Iraqi government assault on the Marsh Arabs

    [twentytwenty]

    marshhawizah121984

    marshhawizah122002

    [/twentytwenty]

    What Human Rights Watch said:

    “HRW believe that many of the acts of the Iraqi government’s systematic repression of the Marsh Arabs constitute a crime against humanity”

    The Background

    In March 1991, in the aftermath of the Gulf War, uncoordinated uprisings against Baath Party rule broke out in Iraq, one in the Kurdish majority north and another in the Shia south. The revolts were in response to George H.W. Bush’s appeal for the Iraqi people to “Take matters in to their own hands and force Saddam Hussein to step aside.”

    While the Kurds achieved success by establishing an autonomous zone in the north, the Shia rebellion had been put down by Saddam by early April.

    During the conflict many rebels had sought refuge in Iraq’s marshlands, home to 200,000 people who relied on the area for fishing and agriculture. In response to the perceived disloyalty of the Marsh Arabs, Saddam executed hundreds of locals, forcibly transferred its population to the cities and began draining the wetlands.

    The Satellite Photos

    The tragic environmental and humanitarian effects of these actions can be seen from the above satellite photos. The ‘Hawizeh Marshes’ were left almost entirely devoid of water, halting a way of life that had existed for centuries.

    Systematic destruction of Kurdish towns in southeastern Turkey

    [twentytwenty]

    nusaybin782015

    nusaybin9132016

    [/twentytwenty]

    What the UN said:

    “The UN Human Rights Office published a report detailing allegations of massive destruction, killings and numerous other serious human rights violations committed between July 2015 and December 2016 in southeast Turkey, during Government security operations that have affected more than 30 towns and neighbourhoods and displaced between 355,000 and half a million people, mostly of Kurdish origin.”

    The Background

    Nusaybin is a city of 80,000 people in southeastern Turkey, a region with an ethnic Kurdish majority. In late 2015, fighting broke out between the Turkish army and Kurdish militants. By the summer of 2016, Turkish government forces had put down the insurrection and began demolishing thousands of homes, leading to accusations of collective punishment against Nusaybin’s residents.

    The Satellite Photos

    The above images show houses destroyed by the Turkish government in Nusaybin.

    [twentytwenty]

    sur2014

    sur2017

    [/twentytwenty]

    The Satellite Photos

    Similarly to Nusaybin, large parts of Diyarbakir, the largest Kurdish majority city in Turkey, were flattened after fighting broke out in 2016 between Kurdish militants and the Turkish army.

    The indiscriminate aerial bombardment of rebel-held Aleppo

    [twentytwenty]

    eastaleppojuly2010

    eastaleppofeb2017

    [/twentytwenty]

    What Human Rights Watch said:

    “The Syrian military has dropped barrel bombs, sometimes dozens in one day, on opposition-held neighborhoods in Aleppo, Idlib, Dara’a and other cities and towns. They have pulverized markets, schools, hospitals and countless residences. Syrians have described to me the sheer terror of waiting the 30 seconds or so for the barrel bomb to tumble to earth from a helicopter hovering overhead, not knowing until near the very end where its deadly point of impact will be.”

    The Background

    In 2012, Syrian rebels fighting Bashar al-Assad began taking control of large swaths of Aleppo, Syria’s largest city. The rebels would eventually take the eastern half of the city, before a regime offensive backed by Russian airpower regained control in late 2016.

    The conduct of the Syrian regime and its Russian allies during the battle led to widespread allegations of war crimes, as highly inaccurate barrel bombs (barrels full of scrap metal and explosives) were dropped on densely populated rebel-held areas.

    The Satellite Photos

    The above images show the effect of regime and Russian airstrikes on buildings in eastern Aleppo.

    The expansion of Illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank

    [twentytwenty]

    westbanksettlements2

    westbanksettlements1

    [/twentytwenty]

    What Amnesty International says:

    “Israel’s policy of settling its civilians in occupied Palestinian territory and displacing the local population contravenes fundamental rules of international humanitarian law.”

    The Background

    Israel took control of the West Bank following a Six-Day War with its Arab neighbours in 1967. The territory has subsequently undergone a process of colonisation as over half a million Israeli settlers have moved into the West Bank and East Jerusalem, an act illegal under international law.

    The Satellite Photos

    The above image shows the illegal expansion of the Nofei HaSela settlement in the occupied West Bank.

  • Should Ireland reintroduce capital punishment?

    The last execution in Ireland took place in 1954, however the death penalty was only removed from statue in 1990. Image by: Jody Trappe
    The last execution in Ireland took place in 1954, however the death penalty was only removed from statue in 1990. Image by: Jody Trappe

    If you believe that there is true value in the concept of life, then you surely agree that Ireland is better off without capital punishment.

    Yes, there are vile criminal cases that occur that make the public question whether the assailant deserves the right to life – but no one should ever be granted the right to take a life.

    Ghandhi said, ‘an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind’, and there is an eternal truth in this.

    The idea of taking somebodies life as a form of legal revenge against someone who has committed a murder, rape or any other vile act has a major flaw, not to mention the moral and human right dilemma it also holds.

    If capital punishment – or the ‘eye for an eye’ method of justice – was reintroduced as a form of exacting justice for a punishment that fits the crime, this would result in a purely mathematical injustice.

    A life for a life in some people’s mind may be an archaic form of justice but what about a person who has committed multiple murders, or vile acts. Then it becomes a life for multiple lives. And hence the person who has committed the same crime multiple times will receive the same punishment as that of someone who has committed the crime on just one occasion. Is that justice?

    This will also lead to the idea that one person’s life is worth the same value of that of many stolen lives. Is that justice?

    In 2010 the then Mayor of Limerick, Kevin Kiely, asked the government for a referendum on the reintroduction of the death penalty in Ireland as a way to curb the increasing numbers of murders.

    In July of this year, Jim Callaly, father of murdered Rachel O’Reilly, called for the death penalty to be reintroduced to act as a deterrent to those who plan to commit murder.

    Contrary to these opinions, a report conducted by Amnesty International in 2012 states that the according to FBI data “the 14 states without capital punishment have homicide rates below the national average”.

    The death penalty has been called for to introduce a form of justice to the judicial system. According to the same 2012 report that, “140 people have been released from death rows…due to evidence of their wrongful conviction”.

    To quote Maimonides; “It is better a thousand guilty persons go free than to put a single innocent one to death.”

    My deepest sympathies go out to any person whose live has been altered by a serious crime. The best way to combat this in the future is to reform the Irish judicial system and create a fully functional system that strictly impinges on the lives of those who commit serious offensives.

    A DNA database, proper jail sentences, a more efficient and better equipped police force would all be steps towards improving the safety of those in this country and insuring a better sense of justice is being served.

    We should not allow our moral compass to become skewed.