PublicPurse.ie is a brand-new independent transparency project that collects and organises information about government spending. Built by William Kennedy, the project aims to answer the question: “Where is Ireland’s public money actually going?”
The site aggregates spending data already published by public bodies, with the end goal of providing a complete index of every line of public spending.
Anyone can access the site and filter data from Government departments, city and county councils, third-level education institutions, and other public bodies such as An Garda Síochána or An Coimisiún Pleanála.
Organisations can be compared using a transparency score that evaluates them based on the legibility of their data and how much information is provided about the procurement and supplier. Additionally, AI agents such as Claude or ChatGPT can easily connect to the site, allowing users to quickly sort through data or get answers in plain language.
Some readers may notice similarities to StateSpend.ie, launched earlier this month by Fianna Fáil TD Albert Dolan. Kennedy and Dolan both identified the same problem: public bodies were already publishing large amounts of spending information, but it was scattered across hundreds of websites and presented in inconsistent formats.

Improving transparency in state spending is a key focus for Dolan. In a recent blog post, he claimed that 65% of the public do not trust the Government to manage public finances. Projects such as PublicPurse and StateSpend are, in Dolan’s view, a first step towards reforming public expenditure. He believes open and transparent sites such as these will act as a ‘Panopticon’, forcing public bodies to improve their practices.
I asked Kennedy whether the data matched the public’s perception of Government waste.
“We actually don’t know if the money is being spent correctly. Anecdotally, we think the money is being wasted but when we look at the data we can’t tell for sure because when you examine a line item, there’s no invoice attached to it. If there’s no invoice it’s hard to match it up to the tender,” said Kennedy.
“Basically, there’s no way of connecting money spent to the outcome. That means we have a system that we put money into it, and we might get some results, but we’re not sure what the effect more money has on it.”
Where the two platforms differ, is that Kennedy built PublicPurse in his spare time over a few weeks. Initially started in 2025 as a hobby project, Kennedy was further inspired upon hearing of Dolan’s efforts. He even arranged a meeting between them and Matthew Fenlon of The Problem Solving Association (TPSA), the co-founder of StateSpend.
Unfortunately, other commitments, including his career as a software engineer of 15 years, and the vast amount of data that needed to be sorted meant PublicPurse was put on hold for a while.
It wasn’t until recent advancements in AI that the project came back online. These new developments allowed Kennedy to automate a lot of the workload. Collaboration with Fenlon also sped up the process significantly, as Fenlon shared relevant URLs and data, even coming up with feedback and ideas for the project. Cooperation between the projects benefitted everybody.
However, even these increasingly capable AI agents struggled to parse information released by some of Ireland’s county councils. Kennedy spoke of documents being printed off, manually rescanned and re-uploaded, with some pages often crooked or askew.
I then asked Kennedy whether there was any way to standardise archaic methods such as these.
“Well, they should be using cloud-based accounting tools,” he said. “When you use these tools, you don’t need to print off the data. We could just grab the information instantly. These accounting tools must meet certain criteria, like they would need a REST API, essentially allowing computers to talk to each other, as each API endpoint would be allocated to a different public body. Then all the government has to do is get just one developer to write a small program that can gather that data. Now you can monitor each public body easily.”
Kennedy also runs CitizenData.ie, a directory of independently made civic-tech tools, platforms and initiatives that aims to improve democratic participation and empower everyday people. Many might recognise Bustimes.org, a tool arguably better than the official TFI app, or Contactyourtd.ie, which facilitates easy contact with local TDs and provides access to their voting records and results.
“I think there’s a misunderstanding that you need to hire experts for these things, actually the public are the experts. There are so many smart people on this island and if you give them a bit of time and you give them the data, they will do amazing things.”
Although, if Ireland has a wealth of talented and technically gifted people, why is that not translating into government projects?
“Being honest, government entities are just not good at building software. It is a real puzzle because they have all the resources, and in theory, they do all the right things; they put out a plan, they have a tender. But when they finally get the product, it’s just not good quality.”
“Software is an odd kind of industry. Small teams and individuals regularly outperform giant companies. It’s why this industry has so much development. People are always coming up with smarter ways of working, that’s why it’s constantly a very competitive area. Small teams are just very effective, and they’re even more effective now in the age of AI.”
Continuing the theme of AI, I was keen to find out Kennedy’s thoughts on the rapid advancements being made in the field. In recent news, Jacob Coxon, a researcher at Anthropic, publicly resigned amid fears that the company was prioritising commercial and competitive pressures over safety considerations. This was notable given that Anthropic was founded by former OpenAI executives who left the company over similar concerns.

Even stranger, Anthropic co-founder Christopher Olah met with Pope Leo XIV, reportedly with concerns over the possibility that AI could soon possess something resembling internal experience or consciousness, and what humanity’s role would be in such a world.
I questioned Kennedy on whether these concerns were well founded.
“You have to understand when you see this kind of fear mongering, that it comes from OpenAI and Anthropic, but not from China, who have just as advanced models. Silicon Valley is very good at this; they want people to be afraid. They want to send out this message so that they can corner the market.”
“These companies are huge lobbyists; they spend a fortune on lobbying; despite giving off the idea they hate it. They just want regulations in place so that other competitors can’t enter the market.”
“Yes, there are going to be concerns. Things are going to happen that we’re not going to be comfortable with. But guess what? Humans just solve these problems.”
















You must be logged in to post a comment.