Tag: Film review

  • Venom: The Good, the Bad, and the “Meh”

    Venom: The Good, the Bad, and the “Meh”

    Despite a solid performance by Tom Hardy, Venom fails to grab the viewer and have them fully invest in its character relationships. Ultimately, this brings the whole film down to a disappointing “meh”. In short, it wasn’t bad, but it wasn’t good either. It is just watchable.

    Tom Hardy, unsurprisingly, was satisfactory in his portrayal of Eddie Brock, a passionate investigative journalist at the top of his game. Hardy also vividly encapsulates Brock’s symbiote alter-ego, Venom. The one problem I had, that seemed to pop up again and again in this movie, was the relationship between Eddie and Venom. It didn’t feel fully developed, leaving the viewers confused as to why Venom – an initially malicious extra-terrestrial being – ends up being Brock’s helpful companion. There could have been a deeper, more resonant relationship developed between the pair, which would have helped the audience root for, and fear, Venom in equal measure.

    All of the relationships in this movie were forgettable, no one is rooting for Eddie and Ann, his fiancée, to make up, the character deaths have no impact whatsoever on the viewer, and Venom and the alien antagonist Riot’s relationship feels really tacked on.

    Venom2
    Tom Hardy joins a long list of Hollywood heavyweights, who have immersed themselves in the Marvel universe // Sony Pictures

    Why throw away these vital relationships by not developing them? Ann Weying, Eddie’s fiancée (played by Michelle Williams) may as well not have been in the movie. Sure she had some relevance to the plot, but ultimately she felt like a superfluous character, that only existed to stitch the plot’s threads together. There was no chemistry between Williams and Hardy, meaning the whole relationship may as well have been cut out of the film.

    Another of the film’s flaws was the weak villain Dr Carlton Drake (played by Riz Ahmed). Ahmed’s Drake, combined with the sinister symbiote villain, Riot, fail to truly capture the menacing traits of a proper screen villain.

    “If you go into Venom expecting a terrifying and enthralling experience, you’re going to be disappointed”

    The movie does however, provide a teaser for a possible sequel that looks much more promising, and hints at a darker, more compelling story that could be explored in future installments.

    Venom, in theory, had everything, a dark yet compelling anti-hero, an array of stars, and a decent storyline, but somehow it just didn’t work. Why was Venom’s character toned down? When the first trailer was initially released viewers expected this eerie and unsettling character-driven superhero film. However, both Venom and Eddie were a little bit too comedic. It didn’t feel like the combination of a hard-hitting investigative journalist, and a powerful symbiote with questionable morals. At the end of the day, director Ruben Fleischer’s Venom can’t quite decide what kind of movie it wants to be.

  • Barry Keoghan & Colin Farrell shine in psychological thriller

    Barry Keoghan & Colin Farrell shine in psychological thriller

    This film is certainly not for everyone, so if you’re not interested in psychological thrillers and dystopian films, choose Bad Moms 2 instead.

    The opening scene of Yorgos Lanthimos’ latest film, The Killing of a Sacred Deer, greets us with open-heart surgery. The bare image of the heart beating is creepy, dark, yet at the same time, it sets the tone for the rest of the movie.

    We’re then introduced to Dr Steven Murphy, a successful heart surgeon played by Irishman Colin Farrell. Similar to Lanthimos’ film, The Lobster, Farrell plays his role with an eerie, robotic tone of voice. In The Killing of a Sacred Deer, Farrell seemingly has it all – a big house, a great job, a beautiful wife (played by Nicole Kidman) and two teenage children.

    In The Lobster, Lanthimos showcased Colin Farrell as a weak character, who was relying on love to save him. In The Killing of a Sacred Deer, Farrell is far from weak. His character Steven exudes confidence, he is well respected amongst his medical peers and he believes that he has done no wrong in life. Well, at least that’s how it looks to the viewer.

    Lurking in the background of this idyllic world is a troublesome teenage boy, Martin, who is played by Barry Keoghan. Steven gives a lot of time to Martin; treating him to lunches and buying him expensive watches. To the viewer, it looks as though Martin may be the product of an affair that Steven had 16 years ago. However, their relationship is not built on love, but built on guilt.

    Some years ago, Steven was reliant on alcohol. He performed some heart surgeries under the influence. One of these surgeries involved Martin’s father, who later died on the operating table. Martin, the blue-eyed innocent boy that we saw at the start of the film, is quietly biding his time.

    Steven’s two teenage children, Bob and Kim (played by Sunny Sulijic and Raffey Cassidy) mysteriously become paralysed from the waist down one day. There is no medical science out there that can explain their illnesses. Yet, Martin knows. It is then up to heart surgeon Steven to make a sacrifice. An eye for an eye comes to mind.

    The cast of The Killing of a Sacred Deer are excellent in how they act. Colin Farrell plays the ever-confident surgeon well. Similar to The Lobster, he is one of the stand-out characters of the film.

    KOD2
    Nicole Kidman and Colin Farrell in The Killing of a Sacred Deer. Credit: Curzon Artificial Eye

    Nicole Kidman, who plays Farrell’s wife, Anna, compliments his role. In the same robotic tone as Farrell, she plays a character who strives for perfection for her family. Yet, at the same time, she is willing to sacrifice all that for herself and her husband.

    The performances of Steven and Anna’s two teenage children compliment the storyline. Scenes showing their paralysis are hard to watch, yet intriguing at the same time.

    The actor that stole the movie’s attention was Barry Keoghan, who played the character of Martin. His unpredictability always made the viewer wonder where he’d be next, what he’d do next and what he’d say next. He is the one character that will hold your interest throughout the film. Any time he spoke or acted mysteriously, it was hard to pull yourself away from the seemingly innocent blue-eyed boy. His performance stole the show from beginning to end.

    This film comes with one big fault. It runs for two hours long. Halfway through the film, the viewer has a fair idea of what’s going on and there’s absolutely no need for another hour. This film would have been sufficient to run for 90 minutes. It felt like it was slowly dragging on until the end. When you’ve paid good money to see the movie, that’s the last thing you need.

    Overall, apart from the over-exaggerated time frame, I’d give this movie a 4/5. Yorgos Lanthimos and his team obviously spent much time perfecting these characters, perfecting this setting and plot and it shows. The music used in scenes is creepy, perfectly matching the tone of the movie. The way in which the cameras were poised to follow characters, spy on characters and engage with characters was an excellent tool to create a sinister atmosphere.

    Nothing about The Killing of a Sacred Deer is for the faint-hearted. But, if you wonder whether everything is as perfect in life as it seems, this film is a must watch.

    By Leanne Salmon

    The trailer of the film can be found here;

  • Review: Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

    Review: Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

    By Kieva McLaughlin

    If you are a fan of the Harry Potter franchise, Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them is a must see. JK Rowling and David Yeats came together again for the first of five movies about Newt Scamander, played by Eddie Redmayne, and his adventures with magical beasts.

    Vimeo FB.jpg
    (Source: Vimeo)

    While none of the main characters from Harry Potter appear in the movie, Grindelwald, a dark wizard and Dumbledore’s ex-best friend, is mentioned multiple times, with the headmaster himself even mentioned once. You do not need to have seen any of the Harry Potters to understand what is going on but if you are big fan, there’s plenty of exciting references you will recognise.

    Eddie Redmayne plays the part of Newt Scamander exceptionally, and he is incredibly believable as the animal loving wizard he is portraying. Katherine Waterston, Dan Fogler and Alison Sudol star alongside him. Dan Fogler plays the loveable ‘nomaj’ (American word for muggle) Kowalski, who you will leave the cinema only hoping he will reappear in the next movies. Katherine Waterston plays Tina, Newt’s love interest, with Alison Sudol playing her beautiful sister Queenie. My only criticism with the acting is that there is no real visible spark between Newt and Tina and the love story the audience is truly rooting for is the one between Kowalski and Queenie.

    FB Wikipedia.jpg
    (Source: Wikipedia)

    The special effects and graphics are superb, but with a budget of $250 million it ought to be. All of the magical beasts and spells are done amazingly and you really believe the little furry blue sloth-like animals and tiny trees are just as much there as the actors and actresses.

    There is a lot of humour throughout the film and you will be laughing throughout. There’s inside jokes for the true Harry Potter fans as well as new jokes especially for this newest magical franchise, ‘Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them’.

  • Another Stunning Irish Film for 2015: Patrick’s Day

    Another Stunning Irish Film for 2015: Patrick’s Day

    Terry McMahon's film, Patrick's Day.
    Terry McMahon’s film, Patrick’s Day.

    Terry McMahon has brought Irish audiences a stunning piece of work that continues to push the boundaries for Irish cinema. The piece comes after a hugely successful 2014 for Irish film with the likes of John Michael McDonagh’s dark comedy, Calvary, and Lenny Abrahamson’s  quirky hit, Frank. The pressure is on this year for films that live up to such predecessors.

    Patrick’s Day certainly sets the tone for Irish film in 2015 and grabs your attention from the first scene. Irish actor Moe Dunford gives a stunning and heartbreaking performance as schizophrenic 26-year-old Patrick Fitzgerald. Patrick’s world takes on new meaning when he meets a depressed air hostess Karen Prescott (Catherine Walker), but his mother Kerry Fox refuses to loosen the tight grip she has on her adult son.

    Following the development of Patrick and his first real experience of love, sex and independence, his controlling and protective mother does everything in her power to break up the union, with the help of a jaded garda, John Freeman (Philip Jackson). Dunford’s portrayal of  a naïve and troubled young man living in a mental institution is truly breathtaking and devastating. The supporting cast adds to the rawness of the film.

    The striking cinematography by Michael Lavelle captures the essence of the story and brings it to life. Patrick’s journey is one that will make you laugh, cry and inspire you. Patrick’s Day brings mental health issues to the forefront and does so in a respectful, realistic and highly emotive manner. The message of this film certainly comes to life.

    It is safe to say the bar has been raised for 2015 Irish film and I urge you all to see this spectacular film this year.

    By Rachael Hussey

  • Review: The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part I

    Review: The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part I

     

    If you know your Hunger Games, you’ll know that heroine and coal miner’s daughter, Katniss Everdene (Jennifer Lawrence) was rescued from a life or death struggle in the Quarter Quell area at the end of the second film, by a group of rebels from Panem’s District 13.

    The film is based on the popular Suzanne Collins series of novels. 

    It was widely understood that District 13 was bombed into oblivion two generations ago, which resulted in the beginning of the Hunger Games, but in fact, much of the population survived and went to live underground plotting their revenge. Now the moment to strike back has come.

    They live in a subterranean missile silo, they have been stockpiling for years and they even have a leader with determination and the strategic nous to overthrow the despots in the Capital.

    The problem is that President Coin (Julianne Moore) of District 13 lacks the personality to ignite the districts into war, so they turn to Katniss, who has become a heroine to all the districts of Panem through her actions in the Hunger Games.

    Assisted by Plutarch Heavensbee (Philip Seymour Hoffman, in his final screen role) Coin devises a plan to transform Katniss into a weapon to sell to the masses.

    And that basically, is where we come in to The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1. Katniss is increasingly uncertain about how she might be used in this rebellion and seems more concerned about the well-being of Peeta (Josh Hutcherson), her on-again, off-again boyfriend who has been captured by the Capital dictatorship and is being used as a central part of a propaganda campaign.

    “I never wanted any of this, I never wanted to be in the Games, I just wanted to save my sister and keep Peeta alive,” Katniss pleads with the villain of the series, Panem dictator President Snow.

    As Warner Bros did with Harry Potter, the final book in the Hunger Games franchise has been divided into two parts which result that Mockingjay Part I is about the build up to the war. This means although there is a lot of tension, it lacks the action of the first two movies in the series. At times the film seems stretched, and too much like a link between the previous instalment and the next, but the story line and tension is strong enough to hold.

    With a notable cast involved this makes for a funny and enjoyable movie and Lawerence comes into her own giving the film depth and emotion in some outstanding and haunting scenes. But one thing’s for sure we have an action packed Part II to look forward to next year, and as Katniss puts it…

    “Fire is catching! And if we burn, you burn with us!”

  • Nightcrawler Movie Review

    Nightcrawler Movie Review

    NIGHTCRAWLER is a well directed, heart-pounding, pulse-throbbing crime thriller that’s storyline is the first of its kind to be transformed into a blockbuster movie.

    The suspenseful story acts as a mirror to what’s happening in reality in the realm of broadcast media and freelance journalism, with individuals stepping up to the mark and providing self-generated content.

    Set in downtown Los Angeles, the film centres on a ruthless thief named Louis ‘Lou’ Bloom who is desperate for a job and who is tremendously tired of showcasing his worth only to be rejected by potential employees.

    Deciding that a path of self-employment is the better option, Bloom sets out to stand on his own two feet and so he turns his hand to freelance journalism.

    Capturing the horrifying scenes of barbaric crimes committed in the heart of LA is no reason for Bloom to bat an eye-lid and soon the social outsider looks at his new interest as a calling and works towards being the epitome of success.

    With an impressive bank account and a bulging contacts book in sight, Bloom befriends as many people as possible to help reach the top of his game and he has no remorse in trampling on those who have aided his progress.

    Lou shows no empathy towards victims of terrible acts of violence or road traffic collisions and hijackings. For Lou, these people are merely objects he can cash in on.

    Rated 16 and lasting a total of 117 minutes, Jake Gyllenhaal plays the character of Louis Bloom and delivers a killer performance. Gyllenhaal effortlessly illustrates how adaptable he is as an actor as he performs his role as a sociopath to perfection.

    Directed by American screenwriter Dan Gilroy, best known for The Bourne Legacy (2012), this drama contains scenes of violence but nothing that is worthy of cringing at with your parents.

    Though the movie succeeded in entertaining the viewer and showcases one of Hollywood’s ‘beauts’, it is slightly dragged out with unnecessary scenes that could have been left for the blubbers or deleted scenes of the DVD set.

  • Dracula Untold Movie Review

     

    IT’S that time of the year again when a whack of horror movies appear in cinemas nationwide, delivering graphic images of blood-thirsty creatures, possessed individuals, and dark magic.

    Image: Alvaro Tapia http://bit.ly/1tX9P1v
    Image: Alvaro Tapia http://bit.ly/1tX9P1v

    Dracula Untold is a ‘spook-tacular’ film that sets the ‘stakes’ high in the lead up to Halloween with its ability to both haunt and entertain the anxious viewer.

    The dark fantasy re-introduces the history and origins of Dracula and Vlad the Impaler. Its modern take alongside the use of state-of-the-art costumes and props, crafts this movie into the success that it is.

    However, at some points, the supposedly spine-chilling vampires end up looking like disturbed zombies.

    Dracula Untold tells the tale of a strong prince named Vlad the Impaler who rules over a small Transylvania kingdom with his wife and son and who allows no harm to come to his district and its inhabitants.

    However, the peace is short-lived when a warlord called Mehmed, the Sultan of Turkey, demands 1000 Transylvanian boys including the prince’s son. Mehmed sees it as an obligation and has strict plans for the boys.

    Vlad quickly realises that the only way to protect his people is by defeating Mehmed and his army of men. The clock is ticking and Vlad does not have the powers and resources he needs. That is, until he comes face to face with the monster every man fears.

    The casting of Dracula Untold seems to have been done with precision as Luke Evans, Sarah Gadon, and Dominic Cooper are superb for their roles and play their characters to perfection.

    Lasting a total of 92 minutes, Dracula Untold is not the lengthiest film to be released this year but, in this case, any longer and the movie would have been dragged out.

    Rated 15a and directed by Irishman and Dubliner Gary Shore, this is the perfect movie for those seeking a bit of horror without the usual jumpy and frightfully sinister insertions.

  • Gone Girl: It will grip you – and frustrate you

    Gone Girl: It will grip you – and frustrate you

    Gone Girl is the 2014 mystery film directed by David Fincher of Fight Club, The Social Network and The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo and is adapted from the 2012 novel of the same name by Entertainment Weekly journalist-turned-novelist Gillian Flynn.

    It stars Ben Affleck, Rosamund Pike, Neil Patrick Harris, Tyler Perry, and Carrie Coon who equally played their roles to perfection in my opinion.

    When Amy Dunne (Rosamund Pike) disappears from her home on her fifth wedding anniversary, her husband, Nick (Ben Affleck), finds himself at the centre of a media frenzy, his every little move interpreted as a sign of guilt and dishonour. Suspicions begin to arise that Nick murdered his wife, and his awkward behaviour is interpreted as characteristic of a killer. While he hides out at his sister’s (Carrie Coon) house, the no-nonsense detective, Boney (Kim Dickens), combs through his personal life, uncovering a trail of evidence indicating financial troubles and domestic disputes, a report indicating the purchase of a gun, and poorly concealed evidence of a struggle which all suggest Nick’s hiding something. Eventually, Nick is forced to seek out the services of Tanner Bolt (an excellent Tyler Perry), a larger than life lawyer who specialises in defending “wife-killers.” Yet still there’s no body or proof that Nick had something to do with his wife’s disappearance and something niggles at the audience that there’s more to this than we know.

    Gone Girl most certainly isn’t a love story, but a movie about the way people can so easily manipulate and entrap one another.

    In the first half of the movie we see Amy Dunne as the beautiful, doe-eyed girl who got caught up in the perfect whirlwind romance but as the movie progresses we see strains on the marriage. We begin to realise that this doe-eyed girl is capable of menace. She’s an ice Queen, passive-aggressive, manipulative, devious style of menace. The exact sort of menace you need to pull off the Amy Dunne in the second half of the movie. The Amy who’s not evil so much as cunning. The Amy you will come to hate.

    Fincher’s style—think along the lines of motel-murder-scene lighting — adds perfectly to the puzzling and mysterious feel of the movie.

    Gillian Flynn’s novel Gone Girl became a sensation for its ingenious plotting and complex net of twists and the film does the exact same. It has the narrative logic of the film noir, with a mishandled, awkward, yet ultimately victimized and unfortunate male at its core, and Amy as the ultimate femme fatale.

    The movie’s most alluring mystery is the question of what’s really going on in both husband and wife’s heads. Who is crazier? Who’s side are you on? Who gets the final revenge? All this remains unanswered, and it’s sickening. For this reason myself and the majority of viewers in the cinema last Friday night let out a sigh of sheer frustration as the credits rolled. For a film I liked so much I don’t think I have ever been as frustrated leaving the cinema and that is why Gone Girl gets a rating of 3.5/5 from me.

    What the punters say

    Margaret (54): “Gone Girl was good, I would give it a 4/5. I was a little bit disappointed with Ben Afflek’s acting and the way the film ended wasn’t great, but Rosamund Pike was outstanding as Amy Dunne – she definitely deserves an award for her role in the film.”

    Michael (21): “I thought the first half of the film was very good, but the second half was a bit too unrealistic and long winded for me. I would give Gone Girl a 3.5/5.”

    Seamus (57): “I thought it was a great film but the ending left the audience a bit high and dry, I’m wondering will there be a sequel but It’s hard to know.”

    Leah (21): “I’ve only read the book, but I thought it was amazing. The reader knows what really happens throughout while the characters in the book still don’t so it was exciting to read. I cant wait to see the film.”