Tag: IFI

  • New Age of Horror: Humanity over technology says director Garris

    New Age of Horror: Humanity over technology says director Garris

    American horror director Mick Garris (Hocus Pocus 1993, Sleepwalkers 1992) debuted the Irish screening of his latest anthology of horror in the IFI last weekend.  

    The annual Horrorthon event was enveloped by a passion for the genre, with fans eagerly gathered over the weekend; pints in one hand and their tickets in the other.

    The anthology film Nightmare Cinema is the work of five directors also including Joe Dante, David Slade, Ryuhei Kitamura and Alejandro Brugués.

    The horror follows five strangers who find themselves inside a haunted theatre, where the projectionist (Mickey Rourke) forces each of them to watch a personal screening of their deepest fears and secrets.

    Nightmare Cinema aka Wrap AroundPhoto by Michael Moriatis
    Mick Garris thoroughly enjoyed working with Mickey Rourke but said when it came to 10pm, the Oscar nominee was done filming for the day // IMDb

    While each tale is unique, they collectively pull on the terror that lives in the mind of everyone who dares to watch. Touching on fears including arachnophobia, mental illness, perfectionism and suicide, it was clear that this new era of horror cinema is turning new technology on its head to delve deeper into one’s own inescapable dread.

    “I never set out to be an ambassador of horror or the Forrest Gump of horror [laughs],” said Mick Garris.

    Keeping with his distinctive 90s style, he believes that modern horror shouldn’t grow from technological advances just because it’s the modern age.

    “Technology is kinda ‘who cares’ for me. It’s more about humanity…the emotional stuff. Emo-horror is kind of my [niche] now, and I like stuff that connects in that way. [Technology] is great because it allowed us to do so many things with bodies, and things like that can give you a visual. The technology is important… but it plays second-fiddle to stir in the people,” says Garris

    The auteur approach from each director was evident in the film’s narrative. Garris’ part of the anthology touched on the concept of family death, directly influenced by his own experience. “Portraying death in very operatic terms” he explains.

    Although Hollywood is “very competitive and cut-throat” the genre of horror differs continued Garris: “We all live in that gutter … we’re united … we’re outsiders and we’re together, and that’s why there are horror festivals and not Western festivals or drama festivals … it’s a group of outsiders who love them, and who make them. We are still outsiders despite the success of our genre in recent years.”

    Although Garris believes that being able to achieve something special within the genre can be difficult, Nightmare Cinema has the ability to awaken the viewers’ unexplored fears.

  • Mainstream films: unexpected virtue of ignorance?

    Mainstream films: unexpected virtue of ignorance?

    Photo by Coffee. (Pixabay)
    Photo by Coffee. (Pixabay)

    Once one of the most well-known critical theorists Theodor W. Adorno stated that culture was important to manipulate the audience. For him, films provide easy pleasure to people, giving them a false sense of reality. This theory has some valid points.  Undoubtedly, some films can broaden our minds, portraying a different viewpoint than we are used to seeing in everyday life. However, we are tired of being in front of the screen, spending hours watching special effects, cheesy comedies and predictable happy-endings, all of which is far from representing our reality.

    With this years Oscars, we were able to see a little bit of everything, including an off-beat, innovative film: Birdman or the unexpected virtue of ignorance, which won three golden statues. To understand a little more about it, I had a conversation with Donnchadh Tiernan, who is a filmmaker, stand-up comedian and journalist, so he knows what he is talking about. As we sat in the cafe of the Irish Film Institute sipping our americano coffees, TIernan said:

    “I do not think that the Oscars has changed over the years, Birdman won because it was appealing to the masses and they have Michael Keaton. No matter how unusual the film was, the director Alejandro González Iñárritu cast Michael Keaton so he always remains in the mainstream. It is a big idea to be ignored.”

    I was about to ask my next question when the outgoing actor added another comment: “What that mainstream appeals to is easy to understand. If you take it at a very basic level it is easy to understand what happens in the film. In Birdman, the events can be very funny but I think that it has something for everybody so that’s why people reacted so positively to it.” He liked the film for being “unusual” and “innovative in some ways”, but in his opinion many good films were completely left out.

    Donnchadh believes that foreign language films can open our mind but, unfortunately, big producers are not interested in innovative narratives, only predictable stories which they can make lot of profits from. He says: “If each country that doesn’t speak English got to put forward two, three or four films every single year on the Oscars, obviously they would have a high quality and most of the films nominated for best foreign language would be better than any films nominated in any category.”

    When Donnchadh left, an elderly man beside me had been listening to our conversation and said, “I am sick of seeing films from the Oscars, everything is so predictable.”

    I did not hesitate to agree with him. It appears, the mainstream films have not changed over the years, but many of viewers are expecting something challenging.

    By Maira De Gois