Tag: online

  • Caught out by ‘Catfishing’

    Caught out by ‘Catfishing’

    FACEBOOK

    Numerous cases of ‘catfishing’ have come to light in recent times, illustrating just how dangerous the web can be and highlighting a grave concern over just how safe an individual’s images and personal details are on the world wide web.

    A ‘catfish’ is an individual who pretends to be someone they’re not using a social media account for the purpose of creating a false identity.

    ‘Catfishing’ is a startling reality in today’s era of digital communication and can have serious repercussions for those affected.

    Many of the ‘do-no-gooders’ hide behind a computer/iPod/tablet screen as they scam their way into building a romantic relationship with unsuspecting victims.

    Not only do those responsible for catfishing steal the identity of other individuals, but they post false information alongside the image they have stolen of an individual they may or may not know.

    Aida Skirmantaite, a fourth year journalism student in DIT, spoke about her experience of being catfished and the terror associated with realising that someone somewhere is pretending to be you.

    Aida couldn’t understand why she had fallen victim to catfishing and what had attracted the perpetrator to her page. “I asked myself why would they choose me,” she said.

    For Aida the whole experience of being catfished started when the fake page was suggested to a fellow Facebook friend.

    That friend happened to run the page by Aida, as he knew the profile picture was of Aida but the name underneath was far from hers and instead supposedly was that of an Irish woman.

    Aida’s boyfriend added the fake page in order to discover who the personal identity thief was but to no avail. Aida then immediately reported the site to Facebook who took action by removing the page.

    Since the experience Aida has tightened the security surrounding her online social media profiles and is more aware of what can happen in a realm of virtual communication. She now searches for any associations with images on her social media account through an application called ‘Tineye.com’, a “reverse image search engine” that has the ability to find out where an image online came from, how it is being used online, and if any modified images exists.

    Another social media account holder Jennifer McDonald commented, “I’ve never been catfished but I get loads of friend requests and messages from profiles that are clearly fake and are people catfishing. I usually go onto the page and block them and I usually don’t write back to them but I did once and it was a weird experience so I just block them all now.”

    Essentially catfishing is pretending be someone you’re not on popular social media accounts as seen in the case of 21-year-old journalist Emma Nolan whose images were uploaded to a Tinder account and used for online dating purposes.

    A 2010 movie entitled Catfish brought to light this shocking scenario by telling the tale of a 28-year-old man named Nev Schulman who fell head over heels in love with a stranger’s Facebook profile picture only for her picture to be remarkably different to what she looked like in reality. The movie was a success and furthermore went on to inspire a series of documentaries on the issue.

  • Revenge Pornography- The Ill-Mannered Craze

    Revenge Pornography- The Ill-Mannered Craze

    Picture2

    A sickening trend that is becoming more prominent in today’s society is the idea of ‘revenge pornography’, the sending or distributing of sexually explicit images of former partners without consent.

    Bringing technology into the bedroom may spice up a couples love life at the time. However, it can have serious and catastrophic implications as many individuals are starting to learn. What happens to the images after a relationship has fizzled out should be considered before things get hot and heavy and someone presses ‘record’.

    In recent times there have been several incidents where an image of an individual in an intimate position has been shared on social networking sites and/or via email and text.  The sharing of such images has, in many cases, forced a victim to change their name legally, quit a job, change professions, delete social media accounts, and alter email addresses, phone numbers and so on.

    Irish woman Stephanie Lord, a writer and activist for women’s rights and blogger at feministire.com, spoke to thecity.ie about revenge porn:

    “Revenge porn is becoming more and more common these days. Certainly I’m now hearing regularly about incidents where photographs of women have been shared against a woman’s wishes after a relationship breakdown or after her phone was stolen, and it’s usually via the medium of social media. Many women are reluctant to speak about it for fear of drawing attention to it though,” she said.

    Stephanie also added that these photographs are being used as a weapon against women in order to shame them.

    “They are certainly on a broad spectrum of violence against women. The rapid development of technology has meant that the way in which we live in general has changed, but it has also meant that the way in which women are abused has changed too, and the law has been very slow to catch up with that.

    “It shouldn’t be the case that women are left to take civil actions dependent on particular jurisdictions when they are victims of revenge porn and such massive invasions of privacy. It’s a form of abuse, that’s about controlling, frightening and humiliating women which probably requires a change in the law.

    “Too often people are concerned with asking why women allow certain types of photos to be taken in the first place, rather than asking why a person would actually upload something like that,” she said.

    American Holly Jacobs was subjected to revenge pornography at the hands of her ex-boyfriend of three and a half years.

    Due to her former partner’s behaviour, Holly’s reputation was utterly tarnished and there was no going back. The resulting consequences were horrifying as her personal life became public knowledge.

    As a result, in August 2012 Holly set up a website entitled endrevengeporn.org to campaign for the criminalisation of revenge pornography. Organized by the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, the website aims to provide support and advice for victims of revenge pornography and for those whose confidential photographs and videos have been disseminated on the internet without consent.

    In the USA, revenge pornography is also referred to as ‘non-consensual pornography’ or ‘cyber rape.’

    A fixation with sex and technology is appearing to be a significant factor in today’s culture with Hollywood movie producers taking advantage of this remarkable trend by releasing block-buster movies including Sex Tape (2014) starring Cameron Diaz and Jason Segel and Road Trip (2000) featuring Seann William Scott.

    In recent weeks revenge porn has erupted on a mass scale, with various A-List stars including Kim Kardashian, Rihanna, and Tulisa Contostavlos all falling victim to this dishonourable craze.

    In addition, cash is to be earned through websites such as ‘isanyoneup.com’, a revenge pornography website that showcased explicit images. Though the website was shut down in 2012, up until then it had proved extremely popular, collecting thousands of dollars in revenue each month.

    To tackle the upsurge in revenge pornography, the British Parliament is considering marking revenge pornography as a specific offence under the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill.

    According to a press release issued by Gov.UK, revenge pornography refers to the malicious sharing of “a private sexual image of someone without their consent and with the intention of causing them distress.”

    Sending explicit material of people engaging in sexual activity or being depicted in a sexual manner may soon be an offence in the UK under the Communications Act 2003 or the Malicious Communications Act 1988. The offence may be punishable by a sentence of up to two years imprisonment.

    At present there is a lack of laws regarding this activity, and so it continues to emotionally damage and physically intimidate its victims while the perpetrator hides behind a computer screen, freely allowed to embark on his/her journey of destruction.