Tag: google

  • ‘My phone commanded my non-stop attention… so I quit’: Why we shouldn’t let smartphones rule our lives

    ‘My phone commanded my non-stop attention… so I quit’: Why we shouldn’t let smartphones rule our lives

    Radio-cassette player used to listen to music in 2020-set film The Half of It (Photo: YouTube)

    We check them up to 150 times a day but is it good for our well-being? Tech insiders have described the methods used by app developers to effectively “programme” us to never put our phones down. TheCity.ie’s Paul Caffrey explains why he ditched his device after three years and explores the beginnings of a backlash against them

    On Friday night, Netflix released The Half of It, a thoughtful film depicting 17-year-olds posting each other handwritten love letters and listening to their favourite music on portable analogue radio-cassette players. 

    Modelled on the clever premise of Edmond Rostand’s 1897 classic Cyrano de Bergerac, the expert wordsmith here is “shy, straight-A student” Ellie (played by Leah Lewis), who ghostwrites all of “inarticulate jock” Paul’s romantic notes to Aster, the popular girl of his dreams. 

    In this scene from screenwriter Alice Wu’s somewhat aspirational 105-minute present-day piece, high schoolers Ellie and Aster listen to music on a portable analogue radio-tape set that first has to be tuned in and its aerial extended — and don’t check their smartphones or mention Spotify once.

    GHOSTWRITER: Leah Lewis plays Ellie, a shy student who favours pen and paper over messaging apps, in The Half of It, released by Netflix on Friday 1st May (Photo: YouTube)

    Currently, a whopping 91% of Irish people own a smartphone, but I was never so keen on the idea. Until 2016, I resisted owning one and brazened it out with my no-nonsense 2007 Nokia. 

    It wasn’t easy shrugging off the endless comments about my stubborn refusal to switch over to the latest techology that’s been firmly in fashion since 2012. 

    Finally, I gave in and purchased an Android, internet-enabled device — the cheapest, least advanced Huawei that I could find. Suddenly, a whole new world of apps and 24/7 internet in the palm of my hand opened up to me. 

    A Nokia 2007 model (Photo: Paul Caffrey)

    At first, it was exciting. I found endless uses for the device, both professionally and socially. But it quickly took control of my life. Like a love/hate relationship, I couldn’t seem to get any peace from this thing until I switched it off at night. 

    After three years, I ditched it. I’m now back to a basic phone with no internet function and I’m managing fine. 

    I can Zoom, Facetime or Skype call — and tune in to a range of radio and television stations around the world — using my laptop. 

    I watch Sky News, CNN, BBC News, Netflix, the Dáil channel and RTÉ on a TV and enjoy listening to our native radio stations on an analogue radio set. I like the intimacy and sense of shared experience of live radio.

    I listen to my favourite CDs on a hifi (though also own an iPod), and regularly buy newspapers and current affairs magazines (though also hold online subscriptions to some publications). 

    In short, in terms of keeping up with the latest goings on, I don’t miss much. 

    During the extended Covid-19 lockdown period, the internet is certainly a lifeline to many for keeping up with studies, work and friendships. 

    But I personally don’t feel the need to access that world using these rather bulky handheld computers.

    RETRO-STYLE: Some smartphones are being styled as cassettes in a nod to the era that went before (Photo: Pinterest.ie)

    I’m not missing Whatsapp at all. Each Whatsapp group I joined began with a sense of shared purpose and camaraderie — and went downhill from there. I’ve found there are other ways to stay in touch with friends and colleagues. 

    In March, Whatsapp was criticised for enabling false “health tips” to be widely shared in group messaging during the pandemic, causing anxiety to many. Whatsapp has since reportedly made some efforts to prevent this spread of false information.

    When it comes to general health risks, the more time you spend on your phone, the more likely you are to be depressed, a Northwestern University (Illinois) study found in 2015. Other research has shown the more time spent on your smartphone — particularly close to bedtime — the worse you’ll sleep.

    Moreover, as President Michael D Higgins told the Irish Daily Mail in March 2018, social media can be used as “an instrument of abuse, which it so unfortunately has been for so many.” 

    President Michael D Higgins was interviewed by the Irish Daily Mail in March 2018 (Photo: Paul Caffrey)

    By any reckoning, the endless rise of “social” smartphone apps has enabled bullies, crooks, scam artists and worse to thrive like never before using platforms that let them pose as anyone they want to be. 

    The internet has long been a world of opportunities for those who wish harm on others; smartphones increase their opportunities.

    Smartphone app Tinder and its ilk are reportedly popular with so-called “romance scammers” who seek your cash rather than your love using false profiles. So much so that gardaí have issued official advice on how to spot such confidence tricksters.

    WATCH: The 2011 film Cyberbully illustrated the psychological effects of relentless online bullying on teenagers in a realistic way (Video: YouTube)

    For anyone who hasn’t suffered consistent bullying or depression before, it may be hard to understand my instinctive aversion to being permanently hooked up to the world wide web.

    It saddens me now to learn that children who own a smartphone are at greater risk of being bullied, harassed or worse, as I know all too well what it’s like to live in constant fear. 

    Had smartphones been on trend when I was at secondary school, my life would certainly have been much worse than it already was on a daily basis.

    Relentless harassment and threats (of physical harm and even death), along with ritual violence and humiliation — while existing in constant fear of being beaten up — was bad enough.

    I won’t understate the huge impact on me when there’s any kind of reoccurrence of that trauma in my present-day life. 

    As I’ve discovered myself, online bullying and harassment doesn’t just affect schoolchildren. Owning an internet-enabled smartphone for three years in adulthood showed me that even now, I’m not immune to it.

    As one good friend remarked to me recently: “I’m glad you’re still here.”

    Coco’s Law: Nicole Fox Fenton, 21, had been constantly bullied online (Photo: Facebook)

    In January 2018, 21-year-old Dubliner Nicole Fox Fenton, also known as Coco, took her own life after being consistently targeted with abuse and death threats on a messenger group. She was afraid to leave her house in the weeks before her death.

    Last year, in a significant step forward, new legislation to crack down on online bullying was named after the young woman.

    As it turns out, I’m far from the only adult who feels smartphone-phobic. Something of a movement against the devices has been underway for the past few years, with some tech experts on board. 

    Former Google employee Tristan Harris says we check our smartphones about 150 times a day and that we’re all being “programmed” by tech giants to never put our device down. 

    Google headquarters in California where Tristan Harris worked (Photo: Twitter)

    App developers use techniques that “work on everybody” to get our attention “at all costs” and keep the world’s three-and-a-half billion smartphone users hooked 24/7, he says. 

    Harris told America’s PBS NewsHour in 2017 that, after spending just 20 minutes scrolling through his own smartphone:

    “I don’t feel very good after that. I feel like my anxiety goes up.”

    Tristan Harris describes how ‘your phone is trying to control your life’

    The Stanford University graduate set up the Center for Humane Technology in 2018 that urges tech executives to consider the mental health of consumers instead of always looking to their company’s bottom line. 

    Meanwhile stars like Tom Cruise, Vince Vaughn, Robbie Williams and Elton John refuse to own a mobile phone.

    Big Little Lies star Shailene Woodley owns an iPhone (with no data) that she uses like a portable computer when wifi is available, but only communicates using a basic T-Mobile flip phone. The star told Jimmy Kimmel Live last year

    “We don’t notice each other any more.”

    Shailene Woodley, 28, blames smartphones for a “bigger lack of camaraderie and community than there’s ever been.” (Photo: YouTube)

    US comedian Ari Shaffir told the BBC in 2016 after ditching his iPhone: 

    “It’s every moment of your life. There needs to be an etiquette built around it and we haven’t built it yet.”

    Canadian inventor Ann Makosinski, 22, has never owned a smartphone and explained why when she was 18 in this TEDx Teen talk.

    Businessman and commentator Steve Hilton, former adviser to British Prime Minister David Cameron, refuses to own any kind of mobile phone, insisting that smartphones “have turned us into tech-addicted zombies”.

    Businessman Steve Hilton refuses to own a mobile phone (Photo: Twitter)

    And after three years of being connected to the world wide web at every waking moment, I found that I’d had enough, too.

    Enough of the incessant social media updates, non-stop email alerts and continuous news flashes at every moment of the day.

    My own inability to stop impulsively posting status updates on social media at any given moment was becoming problematic. The more I used the thing, the lower my overall mood became. 

    Break-out panel: Paul Caffrey

    Does the smartphone and its ever-enticing LED screen limit our ability to make conscious choices about how we spend our time? It certainly had that effect on me. 

    The world changed in the early 2010s when smartphones became universally popular. The days of using our laptops to surf the internet — while separately picking up the phone to make a call — were gone. 

    In the 2000s, we had more stuff, but perhaps a more restful night’s sleep. Nowadays, our internet-enabled smartphones have replaced items like alarm clocks (Photo: Paul Caffrey)

    In short, this cassette-sized appliance was taking over my life. Before long, it controlled me, commanding my non-stop attention to the exclusion of all else. So I quit.

    This AsapSCIENCE video that explores how our smartphones alter how our brains function — and suggests we all take a “smartphone vacation” — has had 63,000 likes on YouTube. 

    Since doing away with my smartphone, I’m unable to obtain apps that range from the handy but laughably unnecessary (turn my heating on before I get home or switch on the kettle remotely from the sofa) to the downright ludicrous (an app which tells me if it’s dark outside). 

    I’ve been reading more newspapers and books and find that I’m more alert because I’m forced to use my brain more. My sleep is less disturbed and I feel less anxious in general. Social media is still a part of my life but I can put it away when I want to. 

    And what do you know, I’m somehow in a majority after all. Currently, 55% of the world’s entire population do not own a smartphone, according to number crunchers Statista.

  • Is social media doing enough to combat abusive content?

    Is social media doing enough to combat abusive content?

    By David Stapleton

    Twitter defends response to harmful content, saying it’s “educating” users rather than banning them.

    Twitter has disputed claims it hasn’t done enough to deal with abusive content on its platform after being questioned about racist abuse directed towards a mixed race couple living in Ireland.

    Meath-native Fiona Ryan (33), her fiancé Jonathan Mathis (32) and their 22-month-old son Jonah were victims of a torrent of online abuse via Twitter after appearing in an advertising campaign for supermarket chain Lidl.

    Harmful tweets were removed by Twitter after being reported by Lidl Ieland and other users, but the situation continued to escalate leading to the family leaving Ireland.

    Appearing on RTÉ’s The Late Late Show last Friday, the couple said they made the decision after receiving death threats.

    “The situation continued to escalate leading to the family leaving Ireland”

    Appearing before an Oireachtas committee yesterday, representatives from Twitter, Facebook and Google were questioned by TDs about how they address harmful content on their platforms — the meeting was held as part of a wider discussion to see if there is a need for stricter legislation in this area.

    Referring directly to the Ryan family case, Fianna Fáil TD Jack Chambers asked if just deleting a tweet was a “weak” response.

    Karen White, Director of Public Policy at Twitter’s EU headquarters in Dublin, said that while she could not comment about specific individuals, she would sympathise with anyone who has experienced targeted abuse or harassment.

    White said that Twitter has robust policies in place with a range of enforcement actions available, and that it had moved towards a system of “educating” abusive users rather than outright banning them.

    “Progress in this area in relation to the type of behaviour that you’re talking about is incredibly tough and I think there is a wider societal issue that needs to be addressed here,” she added.

    Responsibility

    All three of the social media giants present maintained the stance that they are not publishers and it’s up to legislators to decide if there should be stricter regulations put in place.

    “Fianna Fáil TD Jack Chambers asked if just deleting a tweet was a ‘weak’ response”

    Fine Gael TD Colm Brophy accused the companies of not accepting that they are publishers in an attempt to make more profits and avoid legal action against them.

    Brophy suggested that social media platforms “probably have more impact on the world today than print and broadcast media combined,” yet their current response is to remove the content after the damage is done.

    When asked directly about the Christchurch shooting incident, and artificial intelligence failing to detect the footage as it was filmed, Dualta Ó Broin, head of public policy for Facebook Ireland, said they are “learning everything we can to ensure that won’t ever happen again”.

    He noted that artificial intelligence I is already successfully used by Facebook to detect and delete harmful content related to terrorism and child sexual abuse.

    He acknowledged that Facebook is subject to rules and regulations as it currently stands but suggested that it’s open to stricter regulation and that the Government should tell Facebook where they want them to go further.

  • How incognito are you?

    How incognito are you?

    Google Chrome is one of the most used internet browsers around the world. People in Europe, Australia and America use Google Chrome more than any other browser. One of the main reasons so many people choose to browse using Chrome is due to their ‘Incognito’ feature that is available to every user free of charge.

    Chrome’s ‘Incognito’ feature is a mode of browsing that allows its users to browse the internet without their user-data being created and stored along the way. While browsing incognito, the users search-history and cookies created during the browsing session is deleted.

    For these reasons, many people believe that browsing incognito is safe and secure as nothing they do is stored as user-data meaning they are free from behavioural targeting of ads etc. However, is this the truth?

    Unfortunately, the answer is no. In a recent, small study that I carried out, it was obvious to me that although Chrome’s Incognito mode prevents Chrome from tracking and storing your user-data, it doesn’t stop the websites you visit from creating and storing this information.  

    This means browsing incognito does not prevent its users from behavioural advertising, which is a technique used by online advertisers to present targeted ads to consumers by collecting information about their browsing history.

    I created a new Gmail, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter account for this study. Then, I gave out unique key-words for both Twitter and Facebook that I would search for while browsing incognito.

    For Instagram, I searched the web in chrome’s incognito mode on two different clothing sites, ‘Asos’ and ‘Size?’. I found that each time these accounts were logged into, there would never be any indication of search history being saved from the previous session. However, when the social media accounts were then accessed again, it appeared that data had been stored from the previous sessions.

    On Facebook, the key-word used while browsing Incognito through Chrome on Facebook was ‘Vegetable’.  On four out of the seven days of which I tracked my sessions, I noted twelve relevant adverts appearing on my newsfeed. Nine of these came from ‘Vegetable Gardening’, a page with over 1 million followers.

    Not far below the newest/first post on my refreshed timeline, a small block of space was always held for sponsored posts which would also feature gardening tools, cook-books and vegetable deals, with a link to a variety of different stores.

    While using Twitter, the key-word I used while browsing incognito through Chrome was ‘Gambling’. On five out of the seven days of which I tracked my sessions, I noted fifteen relevant adverts appearing on my timeline. All fifteen appeared as ‘sponsored’ posts. Also, on my search page, there is a small section named ‘trends for you’ which contained 23 different posts with some form of gambling content appearing over the duration of this course.

    However, Instagram proved to be the most striking of the three applications for tracking my sessions. While browsing incognito through Chrome, I would randomly add selections to my ‘basket’ before immediately removing them and then repeating the same process on another app.

    Interestingly, on all seven days, I ran this experiment, the exact product from Asos, or a product similar to what I had placed in my basket appeared on my Instagram feed as a ‘sponsored’ post.

    Not far behind was Size. It appeared on my feed with the exact same product on two of the seven days, however, on all seven days I noted a sponsored post appearing on my newly created account from their official page.

    On a side-note, during this experiment, the products I viewed online in the clothing stores appeared just as much on my Facebook timeline as my Instagram account.

    So, for any users looking to avoid behavioural advertising, unfortunately browsing incognito through Chrome will only get you so far!

    Browsing incognito prevents Chrome/Google from creating and storing user-data that can target specific adverts to individuals. While this is all well and good it doesn’t prevent the sites you visit from creating and storing this data.

  • Blog to basics

    Blog to basics

    blog_awards_irelandThroughout the history of blogging you can find news outlets writing its obituary, citing dramatic declines from reports and statistics that hold no true value, only standard data manipulation. I could name but a few said publications, but their readership continues to drop as blogging seems to be still finding its feet. Like everything new, it’s become that much more accessible and the market is over saturated with contenders vying for your attention.

    According to WordPress, over 358 million people view more than 11.3 billion pages each month. Furthermore, users produce about 47.2 million new posts and 68.7 million new comments each month. And that’s just WordPress.

    Furthermore there are numerous places to host your own personal blog from Blogger to Tumblr and so on and so forth until we look at the microbloggers taking over Twitter and other such mediums.

    Statistically speaking, people have never blogged more in their lives. Now that’s not to say that the stigma against blogging isn’t unwarranted, but that stigma isn’t leading to blogging’s own funeral march.

    Said stigma comes from peoples weariness of blogs, and the consistent approach of people to define themselves as experts on certain subject matter when they have no such qualification of experience in the area, but the mere ability to Google. But that’s not to say that you won’t find something exceptional among the droves of voices taking over the internet.

    Claire Kane of web award nominated website Music and Everything stated “some bloggers are being recognised as thought leaders in their specialist subject; like Suzanne Jackson of So Sue Me who is about to release a book, or Nialler9 who has one of the most respected opinions in music. I already think blogs are better than “bigger” sites. Typically they aren’t attempting to fit a certain bill, image or popular thought so I think people see them as more reliable and down to earth.”

    But that said, even the established bloggers have their own critique of the platform.

    Niall Byrne of Nialler9 is one of the most recognised names in Ireland when it comes to music. He is the voice behind one of the longest running and most consistent sites in the country, receiving recognition from across the globe.

    Byrne stated himself that “I think the concept of blogging is something that’s not fresh and new anymore so it’s kind of less celebrated or a thing than it was five or six years ago and therefore there are less people starting blogs. People are expressing themselves in so many ways these days – via Tumblr, Twitter or Pinterest – that blogging in its personal form is left to the writers and hobbyists.”

    nialler9newlogo

    Byrne adds, “It does seem quaint to think in terms of blogging vs. traditional media these days. It’s either online or offline and blogging big and small is a part of that. Bottom line is: if you want blogging to be more than a hobby in Ireland then a one-person blog is probably not big enough scope to make a living from. It’s still a great way to get noticed by established media: online or offline. “

    Blogging serves a function for many writers, whether it is a way to keep yourself in practice or a means of enabling a hobby, and for many who are good at it, it is a means of making a steady income.

    Ireland recently played host to its own Blog Awards where numerous categories played host to even more nominations. It is not assumed that it can serve a purpose beyond just personal blogging. Twitter is increasingly a point of breaking news.

    “I think it is more important – it’s becoming increasingly influential as well as being used as a news source. Take the fact that the traditional news media weren’t covering the recent Atlas blizzard in the States and how it affect farmers and their livestock there, it was blogging and Twitter that got the word out and in turn, people were then able to send their support to those affected.”

    “Apart from anything else, blogging gives individuals a voice plus it helps them to connect with like-minded people and communities”, Lorna Sixsmith of the Blog Awards team told us.

    Blogging’s growth has been phenomenal over the years. And yes, you will have to wade through a lot of the bad to find anything of value. People spew out opinions like there’s no tomorrow. It’s not journalism, it’s not always factual, and most of the times it’s not even right, but blogging is a platform of expression.

  • Smartphones are about to get a lot smarter

    Smartphones are about to get a lot smarter

    Image by Saad Faruque via Flickr
    Image by Saad Faruque via Flickr

    As computers get smarter, faster and more compact we often find ourselves wondering: how much further can we push this technology?

    The singularity is a theoretical instance during which artificial intelligence will surpasses human intelligence and bring about radical change in human nature. While this notion seems closer to science fiction than science fact, recent breakthroughs in computer processing show computers that can mimic the human brain.

    In a statement last week, technology specialists Qualcomm announced they were making headway in relation to their “biologically-inspired” processor that is modelled on real-life neurons.

    “Instead of preprograming behaviours and outcomes with a lot of code, we’ve developed a suite of software tools that enable devices to learn as they go and get feedback from their environment,” states Samir Kumar, director of business development at Qualcomm.

    The tech giant has recently set up operations in Cork creating 100 digital IT security positions and has expressed interest in setting up a research and development wing, which could lead to up to 150 more jobs.

    Qualcomm have already built a robot which uses this ground-breaking technology. The machine learns by means of a reward system. If the machine preforms a task correctly a “good robot” message is sent.

    The companies “neuro-inspired” chips will find their way into robots, vision systems, brain implants and smartphones. They are designed to be massively parallel, reprogrammable, and capable of cognitive tasks such as classification and prediction.

    The ultimate aim is for users to be able to train their devices. The use of this technology in cell phones opens up the possibility for a customised user experience for each individual.

    The enabling of devices to see and perceive the world as humans do is a goal that Qualcomm feels is realistically within reach. “A major pillar of Zeroth processor function is striving to replicate the efficiency with which our senses and our brain communicate information,” said Kumar.

    Other companies such as IBM and Google are also investing millions into the field of cognitive computing. Last year Google unveiled a “neural network” that taught itself how to identify cats after being exposed to YouTube videos.

    Earlier this month IBM announced a collaborative research initiative with four leading universities. The study seeks to develop a system which can learn, reason and help human experts make complex decisions.

    “I believe that cognitive systems technologies will make it possible to connect people and computers in new ways so that–collectively–they can act more intelligently than any person, group, or computer has ever done before,” said Thomas Malone, Director of the MIT Centre for Collective Intelligence, in a press release.

    What will come of this research and how will it affect the average user’s virtual experience? Only time will tell. In the mean time we will have to make do with our not-so-brainy smart phones.